“A bank robber doesn’t get a pass just because the security guard was asleep,” Keilty said. Keilty, in his opening, acknowledged to jurors that evidence would show the FBI made errors in conducting its investigations, but he said that shouldn’t exonerate Danchenko. “The law doesn’t let you rewrite the dictionary,” Onorato said. If the FBI wanted to know about email exchanges, it should have asked a different question, Onorato said.
#PERSONAL DOSSIER MEANING IN RESUME FULL#
READ MORE: Senate Democrats release full transcript of interview with firm behind Trump-Russia dossierĪs for the allegations about his discussions with Dolan, Onorato said, Danchenko answered the question truthfully because the two did not “talk” - but rather had a written exchange. Indeed, Onorato said, it makes more sense that such a call would have occurred using an Internet app because so many of them conceal the source of the call, and the caller wanted to be anonymous.
The government’s case requires jurors to become “mind readers” to assess Danchenko’s subjective belief about the source of the phone call, Onorato said.Īnd while phone records may not show a call, Onorato said, the government has no idea whether a call could have been placed with a mobile app rather than a traditional telephone provider. He pointed out that Danchenko never said he was certain that Millian was the source of the anonymous call but that he had good reason to believe it. The FBI needed to know that Dolan was an important source for Danchenko, Keilty said, because Dolan is a Democratic operative who has worked on the presidential campaign of every Democratic candidate since Jimmy Carter, and thus would have had motivation to fabricate or embellish allegations against Trump.īut Danchenko’s attorney, Danny Onorato, told jurors that his client was completely truthful with the FBI. Dolan over email” about very specific items that showed up in the dossier.
But prosecutors say there is evidence that Danchenko “spoke with Mr. Prosecutors also say Danchenko lied when he said he never “talked” with a man named Charles Dolan about the allegations contained in the dossier. District Court in Alexandria that Danchenko never spoke with Millian and that phone records show he never received an anonymous phone call at the time Danchenko claimed it occurred. Prosecutor Michael Keilty told jurors in U.S. Specifically, prosecutors say, Danchenko lied when he said he obtained some information in an anonymous phone call from a man he believed to be Sergei Millian, a former head of the Russian-American Chamber of Commerce. WATCH: What testimony on the Trump dossier adds to the Russia probe That dossier by British spy Christopher Steele - commissioned by Democrats during the 2016 presidential campaign - included allegations of contact between the Trump campaign and Russian government officials, as well as allegations that the Russians may have held compromising information over Trump in the form of videos showing him engaged in salacious sexual activity in a Moscow hotel. The FBI interviewed Danchenko on multiple occasions in 2017 as it tried to corroborate allegations in what became known as the “Steele dossier.”
#PERSONAL DOSSIER MEANING IN RESUME TRIAL#
The allegations were aired during opening statements in the trial of Igor Danchenko, who is indicted on five counts of making false statements to the FBI. (AP) - A Russian analyst who played a major role in the creation of a flawed dossier about former President Donald Trump fabricated one of his own sources and concealed the identity of another when interviewed by the FBI, prosecutors said Tuesday.
0 kommentar(er)
