I’m not sure how much this has value on hosted solution vs a self hosted one.Īlso, this is just what I read in the specs if anyone has experience that contradicts it – I’d listen to them. The interface on BB and Cloudberry sucks to a certain degree (emptying a bucket in BB blows) but the solution is way cheaper than Azure or Glacier. So if there are concerns of having to many files in a single folder for an os then buckets has the advantage over folders. ago I use Backblaze B2 and Cloudberry and can confirm it works. Amazon S reviews and a rating of 4.68 / 5 stars vs Backblaze which has 134 reviews and a rating of 4.73 / 5 stars.
I can confirm that at least on minio s3 server each bucket is a true fs folder on the storage disk. If you look on the backside all the stored file are stored in the same folder with some internal to s3 magic to make it look like it is a folder. Backblaze has launched an S3 compatible APIS for its B2 cloud storage, which it claims is 75 per cent cheaper than AWS. The one thing I know about s3 (is b2 s3 compatible?) is that ‘folders’ in s3 buckets are more like metadata. Having separate buckets helped keep corruption / rebuild to one backup set in self hosted environment.
#Backblaze vs s3 free
It does make it easy to see if size matches up and I did some data moving and corrupted things. It offers 10 GB free storage space, unlimited free uploads, and 1 GB of free downloads each day. I named my buckets COMPUTER - backup - JOB NAME just for myself. It seemed ‘clean’ to me to use separate buckets per job.
0 kommentar(er)
